Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

120 questions · 120 findings · 6 reviews · Public Health

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 44 · 36.7%GRADE not reported 8 · 6.7%Very low 29 · 24.2%Low 23 · 19.2%Moderate 12 · 10%High 4 · 3.3%

Day care programs combined with playpen provision vs playpen provision

Cost‐effectiveness · 9‐ to 47‐month‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Day care programs (with additional components) vs no day care programs

Drowning (fatal and non‐fatal) · 1‐ to 5‐year‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Day care programs (with additional components) vs no day care programs

Unsafe water exposure · 1‐ to 5‐year‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Day care programs (with additional components) vs no day care programs

Incidence of unintentional injury · 1‐ to 5‐year‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Day care programs (with additional components) vs no day care programs

Program safety · 1‐ to 5‐year‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Day care programs (with additional components) vs no day care programs

Cost‐effectiveness · 1‐ to 5‐year‐old children in LMICs

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 136577 participants
Moderate

Day care programs vs playpen provision

Drowning mortality rate · 9‐ to 47‐month‐old children in LMICs

It is very uncertain whether day care programs changes drowning mortality rate compared with playpen provision (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Rate ratio 0.25 [0.15, 0.41]
1 study · 76575 participants
Very low

Day care programs vs playpen provision

Drowning morbidity · 9‐ to 47‐month‐old children in LMICs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Day care as a strategy for drowning prevention in children under 6 years of age in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Food security · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 3937 participants
Moderate

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Stunting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 3529 participants
Low

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Wasting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2116 participants
Low

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Cognitive function and development · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 5383 participants
High

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Proportion of household expenditure on food · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 11271 participants
Very low

Food vouchers vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · poor households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food vouchers vs no intervention

Proportion of household expenditure on food · poor households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food vouchers vs no intervention

Food security · poor households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food vouchers vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · poor households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2459 participants
Low

Food vouchers vs no intervention

Stunting · poor households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1633 participants
Moderate