Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

70 questions · 79 findings · 10 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 20 · 25.3%GRADE not reported 10 · 12.7%Very low 22 · 27.8%Low 10 · 12.7%Moderate 16 · 20.3%High 1 · 1.3%

Inferior oblique myectomy vs recession

Proportion of participants with reversal of vertical deviation postoperatively · people with symptom‐producing and/or socially noticeable unilateral overacting inferior oblique muscle; all participants had longstanding…

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 23 participants
GRADE not reported

Inferior oblique myectomy vs recession

Proportion of participants with postoperative orbital cellulitis · people with symptom‐producing and/or socially noticeable unilateral overacting inferior oblique muscle; all participants had longstanding…

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 23 participants
GRADE not reported

Inferior oblique disinsertion vs anterior transposition

Proportion of participants with postoperative surgical success (hypertropia less than 3 PD in primary gaze) · people with unilateral superior oblique palsy

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 22 participants
Moderate

Inferior oblique disinsertion vs anterior transposition

Proportion of participants with anomalous head position preoperatively with residual head tilt postoperatively · people with unilateral superior oblique palsy

It is very uncertain whether inferior oblique disinsertion changes proportion of participants with anomalous head position… compared with anterior transposition (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for vertical strabismus in superior oblique palsy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 7 [0.4, 121.39]
1 study · 22 participants
Very low

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Visual acuity · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

2 findings from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 62 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in distance BCVA in the amblyopic eye 12 months after cessation of treatment · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Participant adherence to intervention · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Moderate

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Proportion of participants experiencing an adverse event of permanent diplopia (double vision) Reports of diplopia across all measured time points · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Low

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Change in the interocular difference in contrast sensitivity Any validated test, from baseline to 16 (± 2) weeks · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Binocular iPad treatment vs occlusion therapy

Measurable change in stereopsis after 8 (± 2) weeks and 16 (± 2) weeks of intervention 'Real change' in stereopsis is defined as a change in stereoacuity of two or more octaves. · 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children with amblyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found