Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

83 questions · 84 findings · 9 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 9 · 10.7%GRADE not reported 15 · 17.9%Very low 19 · 22.6%Low 32 · 38.1%Moderate 9 · 10.7%High 0 · 0%

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health behaviour change ‐ Condom use compared with standard care or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use 50% of the time · Adults (age over 24 years)

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health behaviour change ‐ Condom use 50% of the time compared with standard care or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health status and well‐being ‐ Repeat abortion following an earlier abortion · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health status and well‐being ‐ Repeat abortion following an earlier… compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Effective contraception use (at 6 months) · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health behaviour change ‐ Use of effective contraception method compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health Service Utilisation · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher health service utilization compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Unintended consequences · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to lower unintended consequences compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health behaviour change ‐ Oral contraception use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher health behaviour change ‐ Oral contraception use compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing compared with standard care or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher SRH knowledge compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review