What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Intraoral photographic images
  Log DOR 3.69 [2.80, 4.59]
  7 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: CBCT
  Sensitivity 0.73 [0.68, 0.77]
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Intraoral photographic images
  Specificity 0.84 [0.77, 0.91]
  7 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Panoramic radiographs
  Sensitivity 0.83 [0.72, 0.94]
  8 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: CBCT
  Specificity 1.00 [0.99, 1.00]
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Machine-learning algorithms for dental caries detection vs Dental expert / visual-tactile clinical assessment (reference standard)

The positive post-test probability was 79%; certainty was not graded.

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Dental imaging across modalities · Overall (all imaging modalities pooled)
  Post-test probability 0.79
  20 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Periapical radiographs
  Sensitivity 0.86 [0.83, 0.90]
  12 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Bitewing radiographs
  Sensitivity 0.81 [0.72, 0.91]
  5 studies
  GRADE not reported

Machine-learning algorithms for dental caries detection vs Dental expert / visual-tactile clinical assessment (reference standard)

The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 70.9 (95% CI 44.9 to 111.9) across 20 studies; certainty was not graded.

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Dental imaging across modalities · Overall (all imaging modalities pooled)
  DOR 70.9 [44.9, 111.9]
  20 studies
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Examining the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting dental caries across a range of imaging… 2025 All outcomes

  Imaging modality: Bitewing radiographs
  Specificity 0.89 [0.84, 0.95]
  5 studies
  GRADE not reported