Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,280 questions in 114 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

current versions
No studies 856 · 37.5%Ungraded 58 · 2.5%Very low 550 · 24.1%Low 502 · 22%Moderate 271 · 11.9%High 43 · 1.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs HFCWO
Exercise tolerance · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs HFCWO
Well being · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
Number of respiratory exacerbations · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs HFCWO
LCI · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs HFCWO
Adverse events · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 107 participantsHigh
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
FEV1 · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 52 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
Number of respiratory exacerbations · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
Direct measures of mucus clearance · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
Exercise tolerance: 6‐minute walk test · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
Well being · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
LCI · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs BiPAP
Adverse events · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
FEV1: change from baseline (% predicted) · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted95 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
Direct measures of mucus clearance: radio‐labelled aerosol clearance · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted20 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
Number of respiratory exacerbations · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted43 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
Direct measures of mucus clearance: radioisotope retention · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted31 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
Exercise tolerance: modified shuttle test · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
Well being: Short Form ‐36 · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
LCI · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 participantsVery low
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs airway clearance techniques
Adverse events · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
Exercise tolerance · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
Well being: QWB scale · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
LCI · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs PDPV
Adverse events · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 66 participantsLow
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs oscillating PEP
FEV1: change from baseline (% predicted) · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 217 participantsModerate
Summary of findings ‐ PEP vs oscillating PEP
Number of respiratory exacerbations: requiring either IV antibiotics or hospitalisation · adults and children with CF
Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 112 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pain ( · patients with avascular necrosis in people with sickle cell disease
Treatment for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.56, 1.6]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Vaso‐occlusive crisis ( · patients with avascular necrosis in people with sickle cell disease
Treatment for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.72, 1.8]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Acute chest syndrome ( · patients with avascular necrosis in people with sickle cell disease
Treatment for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.44, 2.56]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Change in carotid intima‐media thickness (mm) ‐ at 2 years · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 211 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in serum LDL cholesterol level (%) ‐ at end of · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 669 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Change in measures of growth and maturation: change in puberty proportion with Tanner stage ≧ 1 level ‐ at 2 years · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]1 study · 211 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Liver dysfunction: proportion with changed aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase levels (> 3x ULN) ‐ at all time points · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 9244 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Myopathy: proportion with changed serum creatine kinase levels (>10x ULN) ‐ at all time points · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 6694 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in endothelial function: Change in flow‐mediated dilatation of brachial artery (%) · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ at one year · children with familial hypercholesterolemia
Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia (2019) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.81, 1.26]2 studies · 276 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: oral antioxidants (NAC/GSH) vs placebo
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 125 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: oral vitamin E supplementation vs placebo or no treatment
Nutritional status: change from baseline in BMI · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral vitamin E supplementation vs placebo or no treatment
Pulmonary exacerbations: mean time to next exacerbation · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral vitamin E supplementation vs placebo or no treatment
Adverse events · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.13, 7.94]1 study · 38 participantsLow
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Quality of life · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Nutritional status: change from baseline in BMI · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Pulmonary exacerbations: mean time to next exacerbation · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral β‐carotene vs placebo
Adverse events · children and adults with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: oral antioxidant combination vs control
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · children with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral antioxidants (NAC/GSH) vs placebo
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · adults and children with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: oral antioxidant combination vs control
Lung function: FEV1 % predicted mean change from baseline · children with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings: oral antioxidant combination vs control
Quality of life: Quality of Well Being score change from baseline · children with cystic fibrosis
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis (2019) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies