Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Body‐mass index (BMI) · participants with obesity
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
3,584 questions · 3,695 findings · 567 reviews
No studies found 784 · 21.2%GRADE not reported 308 · 8.3%Very low 1,036 · 28%Low 971 · 26.3%Moderate 440 · 11.9%High 156 · 4.2%
Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Health‐related quality of life · participants with obesity
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Comorbidities · participants with obesity
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
All‐cause mortality · participants with obesity
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
SAEs · participants with obesity
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Laparaoscopic gastric imbrication vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Reoperation rate · participants with obesity
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Objective cure or improvement: > 6 to 12 months · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Adherence · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
QoL · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Number of participants experiencing surface or skin‐related adverse events: e.g. skin reactions, bruising, hypersensitivity to gel · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Number of participants experiencing muscle‐related adverse events: e.g. soreness, discomfort, cramps, pain · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Perception of improvement or cure · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
Disease‐specific quality of life · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Enteric‐release glyceryl trinitrate vs placebo
Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with Crohn's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Enteric‐release glyceryl trinitrate vs placebo
Abdominal pain frequency or change in frequency · people with Crohn's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Enteric‐release glyceryl trinitrate vs placebo
Abdominal pain intensity or change in intensity · people with Crohn's disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Enteric‐release glyceryl trinitrate vs placebo
Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with Crohn's disease
It is very uncertain whether enteric‐release glyceryl trinitrate changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 3.18 [0.94, 10.76]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) vs Alvogyl
Exposed bone (present versus absent) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
1 finding from 1 review
- Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomesDay 7 (also day 3)PRGF versus Alvogyl (King 2018), exposed bone (% patients): day 3 PRGF 9.1% vs Alvogyl 9.1%; day 7 PRGF 0% vs Alvogyl 22.7% (P<0.05 at day 7)1 study · 44 participantsGRADE not reported
Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) vs Alvogyl
Pain (VAS cm) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) showed no clear difference in pain (VAS cm) compared with alvogyl; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
- Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomesDay 7 (also day 3)MD -0.40 [-1.77, 0.97]1 study · 44 participantsGRADE not reported
Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) vs No active treatment (control)
Pain (VAS cm) · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) led to lower pain (VAS cm) compared with control (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
- Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomesDays 1-7 (day 7 shown)MD -3.60 [-4.00, -3.20]1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported