Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

842 questions · 924 findings · 54 reviews

No studies found 215 · 23.3%GRADE not reported 127 · 13.7%Very low 212 · 22.9%Low 208 · 22.5%Moderate 130 · 14.1%High 32 · 3.5%

Supplementary feeding vs no food supplementation or placebo

Weight‐for‐length/height z‐score at the end of the intervention Weight scale, measurement boards and child growth reference · Children aged less than five years with or without stunting/wasting in LMIC
1 finding from 1 review

Supplementary feeding vs no food supplementation or placebo

Mean weight‐for‐age z‐score · Children aged less than five years in LMIC
2 findings from 1 review

Supplementary feeding vs no food supplementation or placebo

Mean height‐for‐age z‐score · Children aged less than five years in LMIC
2 findings from 1 review

Supplementary feeding vs no food supplementation or placebo

Weight‐for‐length/height z‐score at the end of the intervention Weight scale, measurement boards and child growth reference · Children aged less than five years in LMIC
2 findings from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Consistent application of condom by FSWs · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in consistent application of condom by FSWs compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review