evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,730 questions · 18,059 findings · 1,282 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 4,360 · 24.1%GRADE not reported 2,529 · 14%Very low 4,641 · 25.7%Low 4,007 · 22.2%Moderate 2,057 · 11.4%High 465 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Psychosocial interventions vs treatment

Point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the end of the treatment) · adults with stimulant use disorder

Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in point abstinence, end of treatment compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs treatment

Number of continuously abstinent women ‐ total · stopping or reducing alcohol consumption during pregnancy

Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention may leads to higher number of continuously abstinent women ‐ total compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions vs treatment

Number of women who completed treatment ‐ total · stopping or reducing alcohol consumption during pregnancy

Summary of findings table ‐ Any psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in number of women who completed treatment ‐ total compared with treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people sustaining one or more fall‐related fractures · Older people living in the community

It is very uncertain whether assistive technology for vision improvement interventions changes number of people who experienced 1 or more fall‐related fractures compared with usual care or attention control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Health‐related quality of life ‐ all trials Higher scores indicate improved health‐related quality of life · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life 1 trial of single‐lens glasses… compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Adverse events Falls while switching glasses · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in adverse events Falls while switching glasses compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Falls · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in rate of falls (falls per person‐years) compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experienced one or more falls · Older people living in the community

Assistive technology for vision improvement interventions showed no clear difference in number of people who experienced 1 or more falls compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review