Neurophysiology changes ‐ not measured · patients with tinnitus and co‐existing hearing loss
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events of hearing aid fitting and use ‐ not measured · patients with tinnitus and co‐existing hearing loss
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Pain: severity score day 1 Scale from: 1 to 5 · patients with tonsillectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mean improvement in pure‐tone average hearing threshold across all frequencies Decibels Scale from: 0 to 120 · patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss or tinnitus
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
More than 50% improvement in pure‐tone average threshold Risk ratio · patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss or tinnitus
The intervention showed no clear difference in more than 50% improvement in pure‐tone average threshold Risk ratio (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
More than 25% improvement in pure‐tone average threshold Risk ratio · patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss or tinnitus
The intervention probably leads to higher more than 25% improvement in pure‐tone average threshold Risk ratio (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All‐cause study withdrawal Investigator‐recorded · patients with allergic rhinitis1
The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause study withdrawal Investigator‐recorded (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Change in allergic rhinitis daily symptom score during the grass pollen season Each daily symptom score was the summation of (i) runny nose score, (ii) itchy nose score and (iii) sneezing score (each of these scores self recorded on a severity sca... · patients with allergic rhinitis1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Percentage of well days during the grass pollen season Well days were those days with a symptom score of less than or equal to 2, and no use of rescue medication Scale from: 0 to 100 · patients with allergic rhinitis1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Total quality of life score over 12 weeks Assessed as the total score over the entire 12‐week study period in the Juniper RQLQ, i.e. a patient‐specific test instrument derived from 28 questions drawn from 7 dimensions (sleep, non‐hay fever symptom... · patients with allergic rhinitis1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Percentage of days requiring rescue medication (i.e. as tablets) during the grass pollen season Self recorded each day4 Scale from: 0 to 100 · patients with allergic rhinitis1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hospitalisation due to any adverse event Investigator‐assessed · patients with allergic rhinitis1
The intervention showed no clear difference in hospitalisation due to any adverse event Investigator‐assessed (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Any gastrointestinal adverse event Self recorded · patients with allergic rhinitis1
The intervention probably leads to higher any gastrointestinal adverse event Self recorded (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hearing loss · Children with otitis media with effusion
Summary of findings: oral steroids showed no clear difference in hearing loss [6 weeks] compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OME resolution at long‐term · Children with otitis media with effusion
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Symptoms · Children with otitis media with effusion
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects [2 weeks to 6 months] · Children with otitis media with effusion
Summary of findings: oral steroids plus antibiotic showed no clear difference in adverse effects [2 weeks to 6 months] compared with control plus antibiotic (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Median days with hearing loss [3 months] · Children with otitis media with effusion
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
200 participants
Moderate
Hearing loss · Children with otitis media with effusion
Summary of findings: intranasal steroids showed no clear difference in hearing loss (Audiometry failing) [9 months]2 compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.17 [0.87, 1.58]
141 participants
Moderate
OME resolution at short‐term · Children with otitis media with effusion
Summary of findings: intranasal steroids showed no clear difference in OME resolution at short‐term compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review