What do systematic reviews say?

Home‐based training vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Home‐based training vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether home‐based training changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (3 months) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Patient and lay carer education for preventing pressure ulceration in at‐risk populations 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.27, 1.02]
  1 study · 70 participants
  Very low

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 110 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 37 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 48 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes feeling uninformed subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 212 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes unclear values subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.02
  3 studies · 212 participants
  Very low

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 201 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

It is very uncertain whether comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information changes feeling unsupported subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale (O'Connor… compared with usual care ‐ Summary of findings (very low certainty).

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 212 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 1073 participants
  Low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 250 participants
  Very low

Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 1017 participants
  Very low

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 97 participants
  Very low

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  2019
  2 studies · 170 participants
  Very low

Comparison #1: Decision coaching vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings

• Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 175 participants
  Very low

Povidone iodine rinse vs usual or supportive care

• Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Povidone iodine versus usual care (Seguin 2006, 67 participants): a reduction in VAP was found; single study, not replicated, interpret with caution.
  1 study · 67 participants
  GRADE not reported

Saline rinse plus swab vs Saline-soaked swab

Saline rinse plus swab led to lower incidence of VAP compared with saline-soaked swab alone (usual care); GRADE not reported.

• Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes
  RR 0.41 [0.23, 0.72]
  2 studies · 153 participants
  GRADE not reported