evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,230 questions · 1,303 findings · 326 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 73 · 5.6%GRADE not reported 21 · 1.6%Very low 497 · 38.1%Low 403 · 30.9%Moderate 245 · 18.8%High 64 · 4.9%

Intervention not reported

Relationship distress at the end of treatment Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) or Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ). DAS is a self‐report inventory with 32 items, with the total score ranging from 0 to 151. Higher scores indicate less distress. MM... · heterosexual adult couples aged > 18 with a partner having a clinical diagnosis of depressive disorder
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Relationship distress at the end of treatment Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) or Quality of Marriage Index ‐ QMI. DAS is a self‐report inventory with 32 items, with the total score ranging from 0 to 151. Higher scores indicate less distress. QMI is ... · heterosexual adult couples aged > 18 with a partner having a clinical diagnosis of depressive disorder
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Relationship distress at end of treatment Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) or Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ). DAS is a self‐report inventory with 32 items, with the total score ranging from 0 to 151. Higher scores indicate less distress. MMQ is... · heterosexual adult couples aged > 18 with a partner having a clinical diagnosis of depressive disorder
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Relationship distress at post‐treatment Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) or Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ). DAS is a self‐report inventory with 32 items, with the total score ranging from 0 to 151. Higher scores indicate less distress. MMQ is a... · heterosexual adult couples aged >18 with a partner having a clinical diagnosis of depressive disorder
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 2: participant‐ or parent‐rated participant quality of life score at the end of active treatment Scales used: DLQI, IDQoL, Skindex‐29, CDLQI. On those scales, the higher the score, the more severely the quality of life is affected ... · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 2: participant‐ or parent‐rated family quality of life score at the end of active treatment Scale used: DFI, FDLQI. On those scales, the higher the score, the more severely the quality of life is affected Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Secondary outcome 4: global eczema severity score (total SCORAD) at the end of active treatment (Investigator‐rated eczema severity) Scale used: total SCORAD ranging from 0 to 103. The higher the score, the more severe the disease Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review