Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,749 questions · 14,261 findings · 832 reviews

No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,111 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.6%Low 3,028 · 21.2%Moderate 1,501 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Rate of orthodontic tooth movement with removable orthodontic aligners · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances

Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in rate of orthodontic tooth movement with removable orthodontic aligners compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) during alignment stage · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances

Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) during alignment stage (reduction… compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Overall treatment time wearing orthodontic appliances · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances

Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in duration of orthodontic treatment compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Total number of orthodontic appliance adjustment appointments during treatment · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances

Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in total number of orthodontic appliance adjustment appointments during… compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise vs control

Falls · people with Parkinson's disease

Summary of findings for exercise probably leads to lower rate of Falls (falls per person‐year) compared with control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise vs control

Number of people who experienced one or more falls · people with Parkinson's disease

Summary of findings for exercise showed no clear difference in number of people who experienced one or more falls compared with control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise vs control

Number of people sustaining one or more fall‐related fractures · people with Parkinson's disease

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings for exercise changes number of people sustaining one or more fall‐related fractures compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs usual care

Treatment success as defined by the authors · people with Crohn's disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐directed stress management (it is unclear whether these interventions replaced standard treatment or were added to standard treatment) vs usual care

Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · people with Crohn's disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs non‐active comparators

Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease

It is very uncertain whether mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) changes clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) compared with non‐active comparators (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review