Oral mucositis (severe) · breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), higher… led to higher oral mucositis (severe) compared with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), lower…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Oral mucositis (severe) · Children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia receiving chemotherapy alone
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), intravenous led to lower oral mucositis (severe) compared with chlorhexidine mouthwash; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Adults receiving chemotherapy alone for colorectal cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Adults receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for haematological cancers
Erythropoietin mouthwash led to lower oral mucositis (any severity) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Number of days in hospital · Adults receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for haematological cancers
Erythropoietin mouthwash showed no clear difference in number of days in hospital compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Oral mucositis (severe) · Adults receiving chemotherapy alone for colorectal cancer
Intestinal trefoil factor (ITF), oral spray showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (severe) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Healing - 1 year · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) root-end filling showed no clear difference in healing - 1 year compared with superEBA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Healing - 1 year or longer · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
It is very uncertain whether intermediate restorative material (IRM) root-end filling changes healing - 1 year or longer compared with superEBA (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 3 days · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Papilla base incision (PBI) led to lower postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 3 days compared with complete papilla mobilisation (sulcular incision); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Radiographic healing - 1 year · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
1 finding from 1 review
Angerame 2015 (7 test, 4 control): no significant difference in healing of the lesion at 1 year; significant difference only at 2- and 3-month follow-up. Small preliminary study; no robust pooled analysis.
1 study · 11 participants
GRADE not reported
Healing - 1 year · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
It is very uncertain whether cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) preoperative evaluation changes healing - 1 year compared with conventional periapical radiography (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prevalence of pain - 1 day · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) root-end filling showed no clear difference in prevalence of pain - 1 day compared with intermediate restorative material (IRM) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 2 days · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Papilla base incision (PBI) showed no clear difference in postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 2 days compared with complete papilla mobilisation (sulcular incision); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 1 day · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
It is very uncertain whether papilla base incision (PBI) changes postoperative pain (VAS 0-100) - 1 day compared with complete papilla mobilisation (sulcular incision) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occurrence of postoperative infection - 4 weeks · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
It is very uncertain whether preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis changes occurrence of postoperative infection - 4 weeks compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Swelling (mean) · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
1 finding from 1 review
Healing rate · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) root-end filling showed no clear difference in healing - 2 years compared with intermediate restorative material (IRM); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Postoperative pain · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
1 finding from 1 review
Healing - 1 year · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
Calcium sulphate grafting of the periapical lesion showed no clear difference in healing - 1 year compared with no grafting (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Height loss of interdental papilla - 1 year · People requiring retreatment of periapical lesions (failed root canal therapy)
It is very uncertain whether papilla base incision (PBI) changes height loss of interdental papilla - 1 year compared with complete papilla mobilisation (sulcular incision) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review