What do systematic reviews say?

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings. Below‐elbow changes 'Treatment failure': secondary procedures such as remanipulation for… compared with above‐elbow cast (very low certainty).

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.27 [0.07, 1.06]
  4 studies · 366 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 215 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 85 participants
  Low

Summary of findings. Below‐elbow vs above‐elbow cast

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings. Below‐elbow changes minor complications.,j,k Here represented by Referral for physical… compared with above‐elbow cast (very low certainty).

• Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.73 [0.19, 2.84]
  2 studies · 179 participants
  Very low

Counselling vs no intervention

Summary of findings: Counselling showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 0.08
  1 study · 152 participants
  Low

Counselling vs no intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Counselling vs no intervention

Summary of findings: Counselling may leads to lower diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.12 [0.03, 0.47]
  1 study · 74 participants
  Low

Counselling vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 152 participants
  Very low

Misoprostol vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Misoprostol vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Misoprostol vs placebo

Summary of findings: Misoprostol showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with placebo (low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.38 [0.76, 2.51]
  1 study · 100 participants
  Low

Misoprostol vs placebo

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Misoprostol changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with placebo (very low certainty).

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.46, 2.19]
  1 study · 100 participants
  Very low

Misoprostol vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

• Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

• Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 27 participants
  Low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

• Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

• Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 27 participants
  Low

Summary of findings ‐ Exercise A vs Exercise B

• Exercise for haemophilia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 90 participants
  Moderate