Periapical pathosis incidence · Vital teeth
One study reported a 1.4% incidence with bone level < 35%.
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion 1.4
1 study
GRADE not reported
Proportion 0
1 study
GRADE not reported
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations
Periapical pathosis incidence among follow-up >5-10 years was 3.88% (subgroup analysis; not GRADE-rated).
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Periapical pathosis incidence · Vital teeth
The pooled incidence with > 5–10 years of follow-up was 3.88%.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were 32% and 12%.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; both arms had 16% failure.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; tabulated failure rates favored resin-modified GIC.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; the 7-second etching arm had a lower tabulated failure rate.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; cumulative failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; cumulative failure was highest for glass carbomer.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; composite resin outperformed HVGIC in the review narrative.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; cumulative failure rates were tabulated.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; cavity disinfectant did not affect success in the review narrative.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; conventional GIC had a higher tabulated failure rate.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review described similar clinical performance.
1 finding from 1 review
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; compomer had more favorable retention in the review narrative.
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical effectiveness · Children with carious primary teeth
No eligible randomized clinical trials of bio-active restorative materials were found.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth
No comparative effect estimate was reported; both arms had 1.7% failure.
1 finding from 1 review