Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,092 questions · 3,199 findings · 339 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 714 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 181 · 5.7%Very low 695 · 21.7%Low 908 · 28.4%Moderate 568 · 17.8%High 133 · 4.2%

self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Thromboembolic events · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

self‐management of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Apixaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Rivaroxaban (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Non‐vitamin‐K‐antagonist oral anticoagulants vs placebo

Dabigatran (all doses combined) vs placebo · adults after AMI without an indication for anticoagulation
3 findings from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

All‐cause mortality · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in mortality compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Pulmonary embolism · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis probably leads to lower pulmonary embolism compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Major bleeding · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Minor bleeding · ambulatory people with cancer without venous thromboembolism receiving systemic therapy

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prophylaxis showed no clear difference in minor bleeding compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo (outcomes

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy · women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 24‐30 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy.

It is very uncertain whether oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ‐ (any type) compared with placebo ‐ maternal outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo (outcomes

Neonatal hypoglycaemia · Infants of women diagnosed with gestational diabetes

It is very uncertain whether oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies changes neonatal hypoglycaemia compared with placebo ‐ neonatal outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies vs placebo (outcomes

Caearean section · women diagnosed with gestational diabetes; 24‐30 weeks' gestation; singleton pregnancy.

It is very uncertain whether oral anti‐diabetic pharmacological therapies changes caearean section compared with placebo ‐ maternal outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review