Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,545 questions · 2,661 findings · 317 reviews

No studies found 608 · 22.8%GRADE not reported 505 · 19%Very low 695 · 26.1%Low 540 · 20.3%Moderate 249 · 9.4%High 64 · 2.4%

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest)

Graft failure · Patients with deficient posterior mandibles (4.5 to 10 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in graft failure compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)

Patient preference · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) led to lower patient preference compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)

Implant failure · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)

Major complications · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in major complications compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest)

Major complications · Patients with deficient posterior mandibles (4.5 to 10 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in major complications compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block)

Prosthesis failure · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants

Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people sustaining recurrent falls (defined as two or more falls in a specified time period) · Older people living in the community

Multifactorial interventions showed no clear difference in number of people sustaining recurrent falls (defined as 2 or more… compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experience a fall that required hospital admission · Older people living in the community

Multifactorial interventions showed no clear difference in number of people who experience a fall that required hospital… compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multifactorial interventions vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experience a fall that required medical attention · Older people living in the community

Multifactorial interventions showed no clear difference in number of people who experience a fall that required medical attention compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review