Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest): Major complications
- Population
- Patients with deficient posterior mandibles (4.5 to 10 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants
- Intervention
- Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest)
- Comparison
- Autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest)
- Outcome
- Major complications
Autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in major complications compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest) vs Autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest) Major complications · Patients with deficient posterior mandibles (4.5 to 10 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants · Up to 1 year post-loading Autogenous inlay bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in major complications compared with autogenous onlay bone graft (iliac crest); GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | OR 1.07 [0.20, 5.77] | 1 study · 23 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) vs Inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block) · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal)… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.