Fluocinonide in adhesive base vs placebo
Fluocinonide in adhesive base showed no clear difference in partial response (>33% improvement) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
- RR 3.00 [0.62, 14.62]1 study · 27 participantsGRADE not reported
Fluocinonide in adhesive base showed no clear difference in partial response (>33% improvement) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
BBIBP‐CorV – Sinopharm‐Beijing showed no clear difference in systemic reactogenicity eventse compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
BBIBP‐CorV – Sinopharm‐Beijing showed no clear difference in serious adverse eventsk compared with placebo (low certainty).
Topical triamcinolone acetonide showed no clear difference in adverse effects compared with topical pimecrolimus; GRADE not reported.
Topical triamcinolone acetonide may leads to lower adverse effects compared with topical tacrolimus (low certainty).
Topical triamcinolone acetonide may leads to lower pain (mean score) compared with topical curcumin (low certainty).
Topical triamcinolone acetonide showed no clear difference in pain (mean score) compared with intralesional BCG-polysaccharide nucleic acid (BCG-PSN); GRADE not reported.
Topical triamcinolone acetonide may leads to higher clinical score compared with photodynamic therapy (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether topical triamcinolone acetonide changes clinical resolution compared with topical tacrolimus (very low certainty).
Topical triamcinolone acetonide led to lower adverse effects compared with topical ciclosporin; GRADE not reported.
Topical triamcinolone acetonide showed no clear difference in pain (mean score) compared with hyaluronic acid gel; GRADE not reported.
It is very uncertain whether topical triamcinolone acetonide changes pain (mean score, split-mouth) compared with cryotherapy (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.