Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs absorbable mesh

Repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (2 years) · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enhanced recovery protocol vs traditional care

Overall postoperative complications (within 30 days of operation) · women with gynaecological cancers

Enhanced recovery after surgery programme showed no clear difference in overall postoperative complications (within 30 days of operation) compared with traditional care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review