Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

63 questions · 63 findings · 5 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 7.9%Low 21 · 33.3%Moderate 29 · 46%High 8 · 12.7%

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Hyperkalaemia · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) leads to higher hyperkalaemia compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Beta‐blockers vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

It is very uncertain whether beta‐blockers changes heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) vs placebo or no treatment

Heart failure hospitalisation (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) probably leads to lower heart failure hospitalisation (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) vs placebo or no treatment

Hyperkalaemia · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) leads to higher hyperkalaemia compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review