Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional
- Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in hyperstimulation compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in apgar score less than seven at five minutes compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in umbilical artery pH < 7.15 compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in umbilical artery pH < 7.16 compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal intensive care compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in instrumental vaginal delivery compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
Monitoring of contractions with internal tocodynamometry showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with external tocodynamometry (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether pre‐prandial changes caesarean section compared with post‐prandial glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether pre‐prandial changes large‐for‐gestational age compared with post‐prandial glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether pre‐prandial changes perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal mortality) compared with post‐prandial glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in cord pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L ‐ ST… compared with CTG alone (moderate certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… showed no clear difference in neonatal encephalopathy ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… leads to lower fetal blood sampling ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) (ST analysis) plus cardiotocography… leads to lower operative vaginal delivery ‐ ST analysis compared with CTG alone (high certainty).