Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

98 questions · 103 findings · 9 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 25 · 24.3%GRADE not reported 5 · 4.9%Very low 38 · 36.9%Low 25 · 24.3%Moderate 8 · 7.8%High 2 · 1.9%

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

Trocar site haematoma5 · patients undergoing laparoscopy

1 finding from 1 review

Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 238 participants
Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

Postoperative pain6 · patients undergoing laparoscopy

1 finding from 1 review

Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 306 participants
GRADE not reported

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

Visceral injury · patients undergoing laparoscopy

1 finding from 1 review

Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

Vascular injury · patients undergoing laparoscopy

1 finding from 1 review

Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

Trocar site bleeding · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether conical blunt‐tipped trocar changes trocar site bleeding compared with cutting trocar (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.12]
1 study · 30 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population

3 findings from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population

3 findings from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
Very low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
Very low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.26 [0.4, 3.93]
1 study · 51 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Adverse events · health problem or population

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 121 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Psychological outcomes ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Quality of life ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

Analgesia requirements · health problem or population

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Adverse events · health problem or population

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Psychological outcomes ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Quality of life · health problem or population

2 findings from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low
Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 43 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Requirement for analgesia ‐ not reported · health problem or population

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparoscopy

Pelvic pain · women having gynaecological surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparoscopy

Live birth rate · women having gynaecological surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparoscopy

Adhesion score · women having gynaecological surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparoscopy

Clinical pregnancy rate · women having gynaecological surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

Overall pain scores unclear measurement instrument (6 months) · women with endometriosis

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low