What do systematic reviews say?

Radially expanding trocars vs Blunt trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs Blunt trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low

Single‐bladed trocar vs pyramidal‐bladed trocar

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low

Single‐bladed trocar vs pyramidal‐bladed trocar

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low

Single‐bladed trocar vs pyramidal‐bladed trocar

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

It is very uncertain whether radially expanding trocars changes vascular injury compared with cutting trocars (very low certainty).

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.14 [0, 7.16]
  4 studies · 473 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 463 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

It is very uncertain whether radially expanding trocars changes trocar site bleeding compared with cutting trocars (very low certainty).

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.28 [0.14, 0.54]
  5 studies · 553 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 238 participants
  Very low

Radially expanding trocars vs cutting trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 306 participants
  GRADE not reported

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 42 participants
  Very low

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 42 participants
  Very low

Conical blunt‐tipped trocar vs cutting trocars

It is very uncertain whether conical blunt‐tipped trocar changes trocar site bleeding compared with cutting trocar (very low certainty).

• Trocar types in laparoscopy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.12]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 43 participants
  Low
• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 43 participants
  Low
• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 43 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 74 participants
  Very low
• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 74 participants
  Very low
• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.26 [0.4, 3.93]
  1 study · 51 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 121 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ LUNA (laparoscopic uterosacral ligament nerve ablation) vs diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatments

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 74 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

• Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 43 participants
  Low