NSI‐ change in level ‐ Gradual introduction · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Low
NSI‐ Change in slope ‐ Interruption · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
1 finding from 1 review
NSI‐ Change in slope ‐ Gradual introduction · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Low
Number of reported sharps injuries, level ‐ reported seperately for needle sheath and cap shield studies · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
1 finding from 1 review
Number of reported sharps injuries, slope ‐ reported seperately for needle sheath and cap shield studies · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
1 finding from 1 review
Needlestick injuries · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
It is very uncertain whether (RCT) Safe intravenous systems changes needlestick injuries compared with regular systems (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Rate ratio 0.62 [0.27, 1.41]
1 study · 1 participants
Very low
Rate ratio 0.06 [0, 1.09]
1 study · 1 participants
Very low
Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to higher incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems showed no clear difference in incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel
(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to lower incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Immediate change in level in year 2000 (noise level at work as PEL dose in dB(A); range 0 to 6400, log scale) · workers with noise exposure
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Change in slope after introduction (noise level at work as PEL dose in dB(A); range 0 to 6400, log scale) · workers with noise exposure
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
PAR (dB) at short‐term · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of workers who wear HPDs · workers exposed to noise using HPDs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
PAR (dB) at long‐term · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
1 finding from 1 review
PAR (dB) at immediate · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
1 finding from 1 review
PAR pass rate (%) · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of workers who wear HPDs · workers exposed to noise using earplugs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
PAR (dB) ‐ Fit testing of foam earplugs (immediate) · workers exposed to noise using HPDs
1 finding from 1 review
PAR pass rate (%) ‐ Fit testing of foam earplugs (immediate) · workers exposed to noise using HPDs
Effects of extensive instructions probably leads to higher PAR pass rate (%) ‐ Fit testing of foam earplugs (immediate) compared with simple instructions (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review