What do systematic reviews say?

Enteral nutrition vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes systemic inflammatory response syndrome compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.94 [0.7, 1.26]
  1 study · 214 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes organ failure compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.81 [0.52, 1.26]
  1 study · 214 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes adverse events compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 9 [0.49, 165.14]
  1 study · 214 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil changes acute rejection episodes compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1 [0.17, 5.77]
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil changes mortality compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes mortality compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.7 [0.01, 60.29]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes side effects (vomiting, diarrhoea) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.68 [0.04, 11.17]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes infection (overall) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.07 [0.12, 8.75]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes death (during length of initial hospital stay; ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ mycotic infection compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.19 [0.02, 1.31]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ infection (overall) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.35 [0.06, 1.84]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes acute rejection (ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.21 [0.004, 2.49]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Postoperative parenteral nutrition vs oral nutrition alone

Postoperative parenteral nutrition may leads to higher complications compared with oral nutrition alone (low certainty).

• Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.4 [1.07, 1.82]
  1 study · 157 participants
  Low