evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

99 questions · 99 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 61 · 61.6%Very low 12 · 12.1%Low 26 · 26.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health status and well‐being ‐ STI incidence (chlamydia) · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health status and well‐being ‐ STI incidence (chlamydia) compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health behaviour change ‐ Condom use · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health behaviour change ‐ Condom use compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health behaviour change ‐ Contraceptive use at last sex · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health behaviour change ‐ Contraceptive use at last sex compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing… compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Unintended consequences · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to lower unintended consequences compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

SRH knowledge · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes SRH knowledge compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication

Health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer screening, cervical screening, voluntary medical male circumcision, HPV or HBV vaccination · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer… compared with non‐digital, targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review