Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication: Unintended consequences
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to lower unintended consequences compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication Unintended consequences · Adolescents and youth age 14‐24 years Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to lower unintended consequences compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty). Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 200 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.