Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,112 questions in 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 27.8%Ungraded 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.02, 7.32]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
0.5 vs 0.1 second exposure
Adverse events · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 44 participantsVery low
Light PRP vs classic PRP
BCVA: loss of 15 letters or more ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Light PRP vs classic PRP
BCVA: gain of 15 letters or more ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Light PRP vs classic PRP
Progression of DR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Light PRP vs classic PRP
Regression of PDR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Light PRP vs classic PRP
Pain during laser treatment · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.23 [0.03, 1.93]1 study · 65 participantsLow
Light PRP vs classic PRP
Adverse events · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 65 participantsVery low
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
Progression if PDR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
Progression of PDR · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.07, 14.95]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
Regression of PDR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
Pain during laser treatment ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
Vision‐related QoL ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mild scatter PRP vs full scatter PRP
Adverse events ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters ‐ 1 year · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3 [0.67, 13.46]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters ‐ 1 year · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.08]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
Progression of DR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
Regression of PDR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
Pain during laser treatment ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
Vision‐related QoL ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
Regression of PDR · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.87, 1.14]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Central PRP vs peripheral PRP
Adverse events · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.3, 1.5]1 study · 53 participantsLow
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
Progression of DR ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
Regression of PDR · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.73, 1.27]1 study · 53 participantsLow
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
Pain during laser treatment ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
Vision‐related QoL ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Centre sparing PRP vs full scatter PRP
Adverse events ‐ not reported · proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters: · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.7, 1.28]1 study · 270 participantsLow
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters: · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
Pain during laser treatment · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.36, 2.76]2 studies · 62 participantsVery low
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
Progression of DR ‐ not reported · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
Regression of PDR · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.95, 1.31]1 study · 270 participantsLow
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
Pain during laser treatment ‐ not reported · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
Vision‐related QoL ‐ not reported · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extended targeted PRP vs standard PRP
Adverse events · people with diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
Vision‐related QoL ‐ not reported · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Nd:YAG laser vs argon‐green laser
Adverse events · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.38, 3.94]2 studies · 62 participantsVery low
Diode laser vs argon laser
BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.66, 1.36]2 studies · 134 participantsVery low
Diode laser vs argon laser
BCVA: gain of 15 or more ETDRS letters · people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Different lasers and techniques for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.25, 1.45]2 studies · 134 participantsVery low
Vitamin E vs placebo
Any AMD · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.9, 1.06]4 studies · 55614 participantsHigh
Beta‐carotene vs placebo
Neovascular AMD · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.17, 2.15]1 study · 941 participantsVery low
Beta‐carotene vs placebo
Geographic atrophy · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.03, 2.93]1 study · 941 participantsVery low
Beta‐carotene vs placebo
Quality of life · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Beta‐carotene vs placebo
Adverse effects · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRHigh
Beta‐carotene vs placebo
Resource use and costs · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Vitamin C vs placebo
Any AMD · general population
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age‐related macular degeneration (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.79, 1.18]1 study · 14236 participantsHigh