Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,956 questions in 143 reviews · Musculoskeletal

current versions
No studies 555 · 28.4%Ungraded 107 · 5.5%Very low 255 · 13%Low 555 · 28.4%Moderate 357 · 18.3%High 127 · 6.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Allopurinol vs placebo
Tophus regression · people with chronic gout
Allopurinol for chronic gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Allopurinol vs placebo
Withdrawal due to adverse events · people with chronic gout
Allopurinol for chronic gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.61, 3.08]2 studies · 453 participantsModerate
Allopurinol vs placebo
Serious adverse events · people with chronic gout
Allopurinol for chronic gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.93 [0.48, 7.8]2 studies · 453 participantsModerate
Allopurinol 100‐300 mg daily vs febuxostat 80 mg daily
Acute gout attacks · people with chronic gout
Allopurinol for chronic gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.71, 1.1]3 studies · 1136 participantsLow
Allopurinol 100‐300 mg daily vs febuxostat 80 mg daily
Proportion achieving target serum urate · people with chronic gout
Allopurinol for chronic gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.56 [0.48, 0.65]4 studies · 2618 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain Self report · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 549 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Physical function · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 521 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Quality of life · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 183 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Withdrawals or dropouts · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
OR 1.77 [0.86, 3.65]7 studies · 715 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events not reported · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 391 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Physical Function · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 365 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Adverse events not reported · people with osteoarthritis of the hip
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
SMP vs Attention control
Self‐management of OA Arthritis self‐efficacy scale (ASES). Scale from 1 to 10, higher better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted344 participantsLow
SMP vs usual care
Pain Multiple tools6 · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted14 studies · 2083 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Global OA scores Multiple tools8 · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1957 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Function—Self‐reported Scale from 0 to 68. Lower score is better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 2254 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Quality of life Multiple tools11 · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1383 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Withdrawals Losses to · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.74, 1.33]16 studies · 3738 participantsLow
SMP vs information only
Self‐management of OA Multiple tools1. Scale from 5 to 35 points (higher better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted760 participantsModerate
SMP vs information only
Positive and active engagement in life heiQ subscale for positive and active engagement in life. Scale from 1 to 6 (higher better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted93 participantsLow
SMP vs information only
Pain WOMAC subscale for pain . Scale from 0 to 20 (lower better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted751 participantsModerate
SMP vs information only
Global OA scores Multiple tools6. Scale from 0 to 96 (lower score better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted751 participantsModerate
SMP vs information only
Self‐reported function Multiple tools7. Scale from 0 to 68 (lower better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted854 participantsModerate
SMP vs Attention control
Positive and active engagement in life —not measured · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
SMP vs information only
Quality of life Multiple tools8. Scale from 0 to 100 (higher better) · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted648 participantsModerate
SMP vs information only
Withdrawals Losses to · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.6 [0.75, 3.4]1251 participantsLow
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Self‐management of OA Arthritis self‐efficacy scale. Scale from 30 to 300. · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted175 participantsModerate
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Positive and active engagement in life Not measured · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Pain Multiple tools3. Scale from 0 to 20. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted321 participantsModerate
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Global OA scores WOMAC. Scale from 0 to 240. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted98 participantsModerate
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Function—Self‐reported Multiple tools3. Scale from 0 to 68. Lower score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted216 participantsModerate
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Quality of life Multiple tools6. Scale from 0 to 1. Higher score is better. · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted226 participantsModerate
SMP vs non‐SMP intervention
Withdrawals Losses to · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.69, 1.09]919 participantsModerate
SMP vs Attention control
Pain Multiple tools4. Scale from: 0 to 10, 0 = no pain · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted575 participantsLow
SMP vs Attention control
Global OA scores AIMS2 (average of physical, affect, and pain subscales). Scale from 0 to 10, lower better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted251 participantsLow
SMP vs Attention control
Self‐reported function Multiple tools.7 Lower score better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted574 participantsLow
SMP vs Attention control
Quality of life Quality of well‐being scale. Scale from 0 to 1, higher better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted165 participantsLow
SMP vs Attention control
Withdrawals · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.78, 1.57]937 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Self‐management of OA Multiple tools1. Scale from 1 to 10, higher better · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 1706 participantsModerate
SMP vs usual care
Positive and active engagement in life Multiple tools4 · patients with osteoarthritis
Self‐management education programmes for osteoarthritis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted357 participantsModerate
Canakinumab vs triamcinolone acetonide
Pain: at 72 hours (canakinumab 150 mg) · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 443 participantsModerate
Rilonacept vs indomethacin
Functional disability ‐ not measured · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rilonacept vs indomethacin
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rilonacept vs indomethacin
Participant global assessment of treatment success ‐ not measured · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rilonacept vs indomethacin
Adverse events ‐ study withdrawals due to adverse events · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.05, 5.47]1 study · 151 participantsLow
Rilonacept vs indomethacin
Adverse events ‐ participants with at least 1 adverse event · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.75, 1.88]1 study · 151 participantsLow
Canakinumab vs triamcinolone acetonide
Inflammation: participants with no swelling at 72 hours (canakinumab 150 mg) Assessed by the investigator as no swelling, mild/palpable, moderate/visible, severe/bulging beyond the joint margins · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.39 [1.11, 1.74]3 studies · 523 participantsModerate
Canakinumab vs triamcinolone acetonide
Functional disability ‐ not measured · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Canakinumab vs triamcinolone acetonide
Health‐related quality of life ‐ not measured · acute gout
Interleukin‐1 inhibitors for acute gout (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies