Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

699 questions · 745 findings · 185 reviews

No studies found 180 · 24.2%GRADE not reported 76 · 10.2%Very low 194 · 26%Low 154 · 20.7%Moderate 110 · 14.8%High 31 · 4.2%

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: adherence to evidence‐based recommendations during hospital admission · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes quality of care: adherence to evidence‐based recommendations during… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: proportion of patients with ischaemic stroke who receive thrombolysis (first 24 hours of admission) · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention showed no clear difference in quality of care: proportion of patients with ischaemic stroke who… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen within 24 hours of admission · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention probably leads to higher quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient outcome: death, disability or dependency at 90 days · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention showed no clear difference in patient outcome: death, disability or dependency at 90 days (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ion-releasing restoration, glass ionomer-based (conventional GIC, HV-GIC, RMGIC, glass hybrid) vs Resin composite restoration

Secondary caries · Patients with permanent dentition in need of restorations (all cavity types: Black's Class I, II, V, and non-carious cervical lesions)

Pooled across follow-up periods, ion-releasing (GIC) and resin composite restorations show no significant difference in secondary caries (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00; not separately GRADE-rated).

6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings

Ion-releasing restoration (glass ionomer-based and compomer/polyacid-modified composite) vs Resin composite restoration

Secondary caries (caries around restorations), load-bearing cavities · Patients with permanent dentition in need of restorations in load-bearing cavities (Class I/II posterior)

In load-bearing cavities, ion-releasing (GIC and compomer) and resin composite restorations show no significant difference in secondary caries (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; not GRADE-rated).

1 finding from 1 review