Global Assessment (Patient) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Awareness of prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Surgery for recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mesh exposure · women with apical uterine prolapse
It is very uncertain whether vaginal hysterectomy changes mesh exposure compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Length of hospital stay · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Blood loss (mls) · women with apical uterine prolapse
1 finding from 1 review
Awareness of prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Surgery for recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse
Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in surgery for recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review