Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,112 questions in 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 27.8%Ungraded 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device
Quality of life estimating perceived difficulty using the NV‐VFQ‐15 questionnaire · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsModerate
Hand‐held (not mouse‐based) electronic device plus optical device vs optical device
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Reading speed (maximum reading speed words per minute) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device
Reading duration (minutes) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsModerate
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Reading duration · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Reading acuity · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Ease and frequency of use · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Quality of life · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) plus visual rehabilitation vs visual rehabilitation alone
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Reading speed (words per minute) MNREAD Charts · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 93 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Reading duration · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Reading acuity (logMAR) MNREAD charts. Higher score is worse acuity. · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Quality of life · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device
Reading acuity · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Reading speed (maximum reading speed words per minute) MNREAD charts · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 92 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Reading duration (minutes) MNREAD charts · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Reading acuity · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Ease and frequency of use · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Quality of life · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device (HHD)
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Reading speed (words per minute) · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsLow
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Reading duration · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Reading acuity in logMAR · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsLow
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device
Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsModerate
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Ease and frequency of use · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Quality of life (NEI‐VFQ score) Scale from: 0‐100. Higher scores are better · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 153 participantsModerate
Prism spectacles vs conventional spectacles
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision (people with AMD)
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device
Quality of life · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device
Adverse outcomes · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device
Reading speed (words per minute) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsModerate
Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device
Reading duration (minutes) · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsModerate
Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device
Reading acuity · adults with low vision
Reading aids for adults with low vision (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjustable vs non‐adjustable sutures
Ocular alignment at 6 months (orthophoria less than 8 prism dioptres) · people with strabismus
Adjustable versus non‐adjustable sutures for strabismus (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [0.91, 1.53]1 study · 60 participantsLow
Adjustable vs non‐adjustable sutures
Number and type of postoperative complications/adverse effects · people with strabismus
Adjustable versus non‐adjustable sutures for strabismus (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjustable vs non‐adjustable sutures
Resource use and costs · people with strabismus
Adjustable versus non‐adjustable sutures for strabismus (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adjustable vs non‐adjustable sutures
Participant satisfaction · people with strabismus
Adjustable versus non‐adjustable sutures for strabismus (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Free spectacles vs no free spectacles (prescription only)
Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention
Visual acuity deficit due causes other than refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention
Spectacle wearing · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.11 [0.95, 1.31]1 study · 3177 participantsModerate
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention
Quality of life · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention
Cost · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Educational intervention vs no educational intervention
Adverse effects · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 414 participantsModerate
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Visual acuity deficit due to causes other than refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Spectacle wearing · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.91, 1.05]3 studies · 1203 participantsHigh
Ready‐made vs custom‐made spectacles
Quality of life Measured using the NEI‐RQL‐42. Higher scores are better quality of life. · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 188 participantsModerate
Free spectacles vs no free spectacles (prescription only)
Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents
Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school‐age children and adolescents (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies