What do systematic reviews say?

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure or improvement after treatment Treatment… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 6.33 [3.88, 10.33]
  3 studies · 242 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 432 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 185 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 7 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 6 participants
  Low

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure after treatment Treatment duration: 8–12… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5.34 [2.78, 10.26]
  3 studies · 290 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

Pelvic floor muscle training probably leads to higher participant‐perceived cure or improvement after treatment Treatment… compared with control (moderate certainty).

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.39 [1.64, 3.47]
  2 studies · 166 participants
  Moderate

Pelvic floor muscle training vs control

• Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 349 participants
  Moderate

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 22 participants
  Very low

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 22 participants
  GRADE not reported

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 22 participants
  Very low

Gait training protocol focused on impairment level vs gait training protocol focused on task level

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement and training

It is very uncertain whether braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training changes pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement and training (very low certainty).

• Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.97 [0.53, 1.77]
  1 study · 150 participants
  Very low

Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement and training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

SKILLS TRAINING vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether skills training changes leaving the study early: Lost to treatment compared with standard care (very low certainty).

• Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.42 [0.2, 10.1]
  3 studies · 122 participants
  Very low