SKILLS TRAINING vs usual care: Lost to treatment
- Population
- people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
- Intervention
- SKILLS TRAINING
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Lost to treatment
It is very uncertain whether skills training changes leaving the study early: Lost to treatment compared with standard care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Skills training vs standard care Leaving the study early: Lost to treatment · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse It is very uncertain whether skills training changes leaving the study early: Lost to treatment compared with standard care (very low certainty). Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.42 [0.2, 10.1] | 3 studies · 122 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- SKILLS TRAINING vs treatment · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.