Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

728 questions · 764 findings · 107 reviews

No studies found 194 · 25.4%GRADE not reported 47 · 6.2%Very low 212 · 27.7%Low 194 · 25.4%Moderate 99 · 13%High 18 · 2.4%

Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections

Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Extended‐fixed showed no clear difference in endophthalmitis (ocular adverse event) compared with monthly injections (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

'As needed' administration (e.g. based on pain scales) vs monthly injections

Gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

As needed may leads to lower gain of ≥ 15 letters visual acuity at 1 year compared with monthly injections (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

'As needed' administration (e.g. based on pain scales) vs monthly injections

Central retinal thickness μm (CRT) change at 1 year The aim of treatment is to reduce central retinal thickness so thinner is better. · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review

'As needed' administration (e.g. based on pain scales) vs monthly injections

Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

As needed probably leads to lower endophthalmitis (ocular adverse event) compared with monthly injections (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections

Gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Extended‐fixed showed no clear difference in gain of ≥ 15 letters visual acuity at 1 year compared with monthly injections (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review