Question · asked by 1 review
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections: Central retinal thickness μm (CRT) change at 1 year The aim of treatment is to reduce central retinal thickness so thinner is better.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections Change in central retinal thickness at 1 year (μm, the thinner the better on average) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 1439 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.