Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,166 questions · 1,249 findings · 76 reviews

No studies found 378 · 30.3%GRADE not reported 61 · 4.9%Very low 377 · 30.2%Low 284 · 22.7%Moderate 120 · 9.6%High 29 · 2.3%

Heparin vs no treatment

Frequency of adverse events ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with low molecular weight heparin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with low molecular weight heparin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

Frequency of adverse events ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with low molecular weight heparin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Frequency of adverse events ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Overall survival ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes overall survival ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

All‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifaximin vs placebo or no intervention

Mortality ‐ total number · prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifaximin showed no clear difference in mortality ‐ total number compared with placebo/no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifaximin vs placebo or no intervention

Serious adverse events ‐ total number of participants · prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis

Summary of findings table ‐ Rifaximin showed no clear difference in serious adverse events ‐ total number of participants compared with placebo/no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review