Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

510 questions · 513 findings · 62 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 96 · 18.7%GRADE not reported 13 · 2.5%Very low 181 · 35.3%Low 121 · 23.6%Moderate 69 · 13.5%High 33 · 6.4%

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: improvement in quality of life · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome: recurrence‐free interval · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in mortality · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in number and/or frequency of surgical interventions and/or time until first relapse requiring surgery · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in number and/or duration of hospital stay(s) · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Reduction in volume of disease, assessed endoscopically · 23 patients aged two years or older with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Asthma symptoms measured using various techniques. · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life Measured using various scales. · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Exercise tolerance Measured using 6MWD · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

PEFR L/min · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

VEmax · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

VOmax · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

HRmax bpm · patients with asthma aged eight years or older
1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids ‐ adults · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief leads to lower patients with exacerbations requiring oral steroids compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Patients with serious adverse events · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief showed no clear difference in patients with serious adverse events compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SiT for maintenance/relief vs higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA

Patients with severe exacerbations (requiring hospitalisation or ER visit) · Studies recruited adults and adolescents aged 12 and older with chronic asthma

SiT for maintenance/relief leads to lower patients with severe exacerbations (requiring hospitalisation or ER… compared with higher‐dose ICS/LABA + SABA (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health outcomes · Various (pregnant women; daily smokers aged 16 and older; university students; children aged 5‐13)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Other outcomes · Various (pregnant women; daily smokers aged 16 and older; university students; children aged 5‐13)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review