Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,411 questions · 1,474 findings · 170 reviews

No studies found 336 · 22.8%GRADE not reported 97 · 6.6%Very low 419 · 28.4%Low 395 · 26.8%Moderate 188 · 12.8%High 39 · 2.6%

Intervention not reported

Hospital length of stay · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

The intervention showed no clear difference in hospital length of stay (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Unscheduled readmission · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

The intervention probably leads to lower unscheduled readmission (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient health status · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Satisfaction of patients, care givers and healthcare professionals · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes satisfaction of patients, care givers and healthcare professionals (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Healthcare resource use and costs · patients admitted to hospital with a medical condition (27 trials), with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (4 trials), following a…

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes healthcare resource use and costs (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, actual cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (3 months postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Attitudes toward the duty to report child abuse and neglect Measured by: professionals’ self‐reported attitudes towards the duty to report child abuse and neglect Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (professionals' self‐report, hypothetical vignette cases) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Number of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (official records of reports made to child protection authorities) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Quality of reported cases of child abuse and neglect (official records of reports made to child protection authorities) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Adverse events · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of reporting duty, processes, and procedures Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of jurisdictional or institutional reporting duties, or both Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of core concepts in child abuse and neglect (all forms) Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of all forms of child abuse and neglect (general measure) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Knowledge of core concepts in child abuse and neglect (child sexual abuse only) Measured by: professionals' self‐reported knowledge of child sexual abuse (specific measure) Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervention) · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect vs no training, waitlist control, or alternative training not related to child abuse and neglect (primary outcomes)

Skill in distinguishing between reportable and non‐reportable child abuse and neglect cases Measured by: professionals’ performance on simulated cases scored by trained and blinded expert panel Time of outcome assessment: short term (postintervent... · postqualified professionals, including elementary and high school teachers, childcare professionals, medical practitioners, nurses, and…
1 finding from 1 review

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION vs medical treatment

Death or severe disability (mRS > 4) at 6 to 12 months · malignant cerebral oedema after ischaemic stroke

Summary of findings table ‐ surgical decompression leads to lower death or severe disability (mRS > 4) at 6 to 12 months compared with medical treatment alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION vs medical treatment

Death or moderate disability (mRS > 3) at 6 to 12 months · malignant cerebral oedema after ischaemic stroke

Summary of findings table ‐ surgical decompression probably leads to lower death or moderate disability (mRS > 3) at 6 to 12 months compared with medical treatment alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION vs medical treatment

Severe disability (mRS = 5) at 6 to 12 months · malignant cerebral oedema after ischaemic stroke

Summary of findings table ‐ surgical decompression showed no clear difference in severe disability (mRS = 5) at 6 to 12 months compared with medical treatment alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review