Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,749 questions · 14,273 findings · 834 reviews

No studies found 3,655 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 2,115 · 14.8%Very low 3,646 · 25.5%Low 3,034 · 21.3%Moderate 1,503 · 10.5%High 320 · 2.2%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignmentPirani score. Scale from: 0 to 6. A lower score indicates better alignment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function ‐ · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignment Pirani score. A lower score indicates better alignment. Scale from: 0 to 6. · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The intervention may leads to lower adverse events (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

IFN‐α + PUVA vs PUVA

Improvement of quality of life · people with mycosis fungoides

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Bexarotene + PUVA vs PUVA

Common adverse effects ‐ Photosensitivity (Time point of measurement: up to 16 weeks) · people with mycosis fungoides

Bexarotene + PUVA showed no clear difference in common adverse effects ‐ Photosensitivity (Time point of… compared with PUVA alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bexarotene + PUVA vs PUVA

Complete response · people with mycosis fungoides

Bexarotene + PUVA showed no clear difference in complete response (Time point of measurement: up to 16 weeks) compared with PUVA alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bexarotene + PUVA vs PUVA

Objective response rate · people with mycosis fungoides

Bexarotene + PUVA showed no clear difference in objective response rate (Time point of measurement: up to 16 weeks) compared with PUVA alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review