Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,773 questions · 1,817 findings · 212 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 383 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 192 · 10.6%Very low 472 · 26%Low 444 · 24.4%Moderate 228 · 12.5%High 98 · 5.4%

Intervention not reported

Phase 3 ‐ conducted in 1994 on one road in one province Noord‐Brabant. The reduction in crashes found in 1991 had been maintained.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

About 25% reduction in crashes to that expected. A significant 11% reduction in number of victims, with an average decrease of 139 daytime traffic crashes requiring an ambulance. A 17% reduction in daytime crash fatalities.

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Outcome measures were numbers of road crashes, numbers of people injured (combined fatal and non‐fatal) and number of vehicles involved in crashes. The relative risk of a road crash after implementation was 0.73 (5% CI = 0.63, 0.85) This effect wa...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

A 45.74% reduction in weighted injury crashes within 250 metres from camera sites (total monthly before count of 23.4 compared to total monthly after count of 12.7) with lesser but still significant decreases observed in the wider surrounding area...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Crash outcomes measured: Killed and seriously injured (KSIs) and personal injury crashes (PICs). Across all sites KSI's decreased by 42%. This equated to about 1700 fewer KSI's per annum at these camera sites. Fixed cameras in both urban (47% redu...

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Having controlled for season and general trends, injury crash outcomes in experimental areas relative to control areas were a net reduction of 11% (p= 0.03) in all crashes and 19% (p=0.002) in injury crashes on open roads across the region associa...

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Early removal of the LMA vs late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia

Desaturation (immediate) · patients with general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether early removal of the LMA changes desaturation (immediate) compared with late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early removal of the LMA vs late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia

Coughing (immediate) · patients with general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether early removal of the LMA changes coughing (immediate) compared with late removal of the LMA after general anaesthesia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

5‐HT3 antagonists vs placebo

Nausea · women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

5‐HT3 antagonists may leads to lower nausea ‐ intraoperative compared with placebo (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Corticosteroids vs placebo

Nausea · women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Corticosteroids probably leads to lower nausea ‐ postoperative compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Anticholinergic medication vs placebo

Nausea · women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Anticholinergics may leads to lower nausea ‐ intraoperative compared with placebo (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review