Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,751 questions · 12,775 findings · 807 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,413 · 26.7%GRADE not reported 709 · 5.5%Very low 3,483 · 27.3%Low 3,165 · 24.8%Moderate 1,628 · 12.7%High 377 · 3%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with relapsed or recurrent CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignment · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignmentPirani score. Scale from: 0 to 6. A lower score indicates better alignment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with neglected CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function ‐ · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Foot alignment Pirani score. A lower score indicates better alignment. Scale from: 0 to 6. · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV (type of case (i.e. whether initial presentation or relapsed) not specified)
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with CTEV at initial presentation
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events · participants with CTEV at initial presentation

The intervention may leads to lower adverse events (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gait assessment · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Health‐related quality of life · participants with resistant CTEV

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

IFN‐α + PUVA vs PUVA

Improvement of quality of life · people with mycosis fungoides

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review