Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,720 questions · 15,377 findings · 900 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3,865 · 25.1%GRADE not reported 2,291 · 14.9%Very low 3,875 · 25.2%Low 3,287 · 21.4%Moderate 1,681 · 10.9%High 378 · 2.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Yoga vs no intervention

Anxiety (trait) · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention

Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention

Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention

Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 25 participants
Very low

Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet

Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 26 participants
Very low

Kefir ( Lactobacillus bacteria) vs no intervention

Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 20 participants
GRADE not reported

Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine

Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine

Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine

Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Stellate ganglion block vs sulphasalazine

Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet

Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 26 participants
Very low

Low FODMAP diet vs sham diet

Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients

It is very uncertain whether low FODMAPs diet changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with sham diet (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.85
1 study · 52 participants
Very low

Relaxation vs WAIT LIST

Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Relaxation vs WAIT LIST

Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Relaxation vs WAIT LIST

Pain intensity (end of intervention, unidentified 0‐10 scale) · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Relaxation vs WAIT LIST

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · UC patients

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in ulcerative colitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Comparison 1: Individual CBT‐based psychotherapy vs TAU or another comparator

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)

Comparison 1: Individual CBT‐based psychotherapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH by post‐intervention compared with TAU or other comparator (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.93 [0.12, 7.24]
2 studies · 51 participants
Low

Comparison 2: DBT‐A vs TAU or another comparator

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)

Comparison 2: DBT‐A leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.46 [0.26, 0.82]
4 studies · 270 participants
High

Comparison 3: MBT‐A vs TAU or another comparator

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)

It is very uncertain whether comparison 3: MBT‐A changes repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.7 [0.06, 8.46]
2 studies · 85 participants
Very low

Family therapy vs placebo

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)

Comparison 7: Family therapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1 [0.49, 2.07]
2 studies · 191 participants
Moderate