Intervention not reported
BEV_RT vs RT · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RIN_CRT vs CRT · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
TTF_AC vs AC · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
IRI_BEV_RT vs CRT · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
TMZ (3 RCTs, 538 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: radiotherapy with 40 Gy in 15 fractions (RT40); radiotherapy with 60 Gy in…
The intervention may leads to lower TMZ (3 RCTs, 538 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
CRT (2 RCTs; 635 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: radiotherapy with 40 Gy in 15 fractions (RT40); radiotherapy with 60 Gy in…
The intervention led to lower CRT (2 RCTs; 635 participants); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV_CRT (1 RCT; 73 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: radiotherapy with 40 Gy in 15 fractions (RT40); radiotherapy with 60 Gy in…
The intervention led to lower BEV_CRT (1 RCT; 73 participants); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
RT 40 (4 RCTs; 930 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: chemoradiotherapy (CRT); chemoradiotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV_CRT);…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV_RT (1 RCT; 75 participants) · elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma Interventions: chemoradiotherapy (CRT); chemoradiotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV_CRT);…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV_RT (1 RCT; 75 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mental health outcomes · health and social professionals
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Resilience (critical outcome) · health and social professionals
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Psychological symptoms of anxiety, depression or stress · health and social professionals
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Burnout · health and social professionals
1 finding from 1 review
Effects on workplace staffing ‐ absenteeism · health and social professionals
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Overall survival
Intensive follow‐up showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with less intensive follow‐up (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Colorectal cancer‐specific survival
Intensive follow‐up showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer‐specific survival compared with less intensive follow‐up (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with relapse‐free survival at ≥ 12 months
Intensive follow‐up showed no clear difference in relapse‐free survival compared with less intensive follow‐up (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Salvage surgery (SS)
Intensive follow‐up leads to higher salvage surgery (surgery at relapse with curative intent) compared with less intensive follow‐up (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Interval recurrences (IR)
Intensive follow‐up probably leads to lower interval recurrences (recurrence CRC diagnosed between scheduled compared with less intensive follow‐up (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Harms Colonoscopy complications ‐ bowel perforation
It is very uncertain whether intensive follow‐up changes harms Colonoscopy complications ‐ bowel perforation compared with less intensive follow‐up (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review