Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,776 questions · 7,311 findings · 959 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,498 · 20.5%GRADE not reported 303 · 4.1%Very low 1,839 · 25.2%Low 1,991 · 27.2%Moderate 1,277 · 17.5%High 403 · 5.5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Agricultural education with post‐harvest technologies vs usual agricultural support

Weight‐for‐length/height z‐score at the end of the intervention Weight scale, measurement boards and child growth reference · pregnant and lactating women, infants, and children
1 finding from 1 review

Agricultural education with post‐harvest technologies vs usual agricultural support

Unintended effects of agricultural and nutritional education interventions to reduce the aflatoxin intake of infants, children, pregnant and lactating women · pregnant and lactating women, infants, and children
1 finding from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Instrumented gait analysis (kinematics) (not measured) · children with CP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Function · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Satisfaction (not measured) · children with CP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Adverse events · children with CP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs usual care or physiotherapy

Gait assessment ‐ not measured · children with CP

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Observational gait analysis (improvement) · children with CP

BoNT‐A probably leads to higher observational gait analysis (improvement) compared with placebo or sham (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Function · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Range of motion (passive ankle dorsiflexion) · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Satisfaction · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Spasticity (ankle plantarflexors) · children with CP
3 findings from 1 review

BoNT‐A vs sham

Adverse events · children with CP

BoNT‐A showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with placebo or sham (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review