Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,760 questions · 8,065 findings · 1,036 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,686 · 20.9%GRADE not reported 675 · 8.4%Very low 1,953 · 24.2%Low 2,048 · 25.4%Moderate 1,296 · 16.1%High 407 · 5%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Food and nutrition subsidies vs no intervention

Food security · primary schools and households and members of healthcare plan

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food and nutrition subsidies vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · primary schools and households and members of healthcare plan

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 656 participants
Low

Food and nutrition subsidies vs no intervention

Stunting · primary schools and households and members of healthcare plan

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food and nutrition subsidies vs no intervention

Wasting · primary schools and households and members of healthcare plan

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Food and nutrition subsidies vs no intervention

Cognitive function and development · primary schools and households and members of healthcare plan

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Social support vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · households at risk of food insecurity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Social support vs no intervention

Proportion of household expenditure on food · households at risk of food insecurity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Social support vs no intervention

Food security · households at risk of food insecurity

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1687 participants
Very low

Social support vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · households at risk of food insecurity

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1615 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Dietary diversity · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
10 studies · 12631 participants
Low

Social support vs no intervention

Stunting · households at risk of food insecurity

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1481 participants
Low

Social support vs no intervention

Wasting · households at risk of food insecurity

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1481 participants
Moderate

Social support vs no intervention

Cognitive function and development · households at risk of food insecurity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Stunting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 4713 participants
Low

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Wasting · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 6396 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: unconditional cash transfer vs no intervention

Cognitive function and development · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 10813 participants
High

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Prevalence of undernourishment · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conditional cash transfers vs no intervention

Proportion of household expenditure on food · children (0 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) or households

1 finding from 1 review

Community‐level interventions for improving access to food in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 4760 participants
High

Salt bath + UVB vs UVB alone

PASI‐75 (number of participants with event) · people with chronic plaque psoriasis

Salt bath + UVB may leads to higher PASI‐75 (number of participants with event) compared with UVB alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Indoor salt water baths followed by artificial ultraviolet B light for chronic plaque psoriasis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.71 [1.24, 2.35]
2 studies · 278 participants
Low

Salt bath + UVB vs UVB alone

Number of adverse events requiring discontinuation of treatment ‐ not reported · people with chronic plaque psoriasis

Salt bath + UVB showed no clear difference in treatment‐related adverse events requiring withdrawal (number of… compared with UVB alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Indoor salt water baths followed by artificial ultraviolet B light for chronic plaque psoriasis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.35, 2.64]
2 studies · 404 participants
Low