Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain intensity (measure on a 0‐3 four‐point scale) · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain intensity (0‐10cm visual analogue scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · UC patients
It is very uncertain whether low FODMAPs diet changes withdrawal due to adverse events compared with sham diet (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment success as defined by the authors · UC patients
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain frequency or change in pain frequency · UC patients
2 findings from 1 review
Pain intensity (end of intervention, unidentified 0‐10 scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · UC patients
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 1: Individual CBT‐based psychotherapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH by post‐intervention compared with TAU or other comparator (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 2: DBT‐A leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
It is very uncertain whether comparison 3: MBT‐A changes repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in children and adolescents (up to 18 years or age)
Comparison 7: Family therapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Comparison 1.1: Individual‐based CBT‐based psychotherapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Comparison 4: Emotion‐regulation psychotherapy probably leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · self‐harm in adults
Comparison 5: Psychodynamic psychotherapy showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with TAU or another comparator (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review