Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,771 questions · 10,185 findings · 893 reviews

No studies found 2,109 · 20.7%GRADE not reported 1,125 · 11%Very low 2,279 · 22.4%Low 2,514 · 24.7%Moderate 1,709 · 16.8%High 449 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: haemorrhage · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: haemorrhage compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib plus lapatinib vs lapatinib

Adverse events: thromboembolic events · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib plus lapatinib changes specific adverse events: thromboembolic events compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pazopanib vs lapatinib

Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae · women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

It is very uncertain whether pazopanib changes specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae compared with lapatinib (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review