Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

578 questions · 600 findings · 55 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 143 · 23.8%GRADE not reported 69 · 11.5%Very low 100 · 16.7%Low 142 · 23.7%Moderate 116 · 19.3%High 30 · 5%

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Incidence and severity of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (incidence only reported) · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

It is very uncertain whether admission cardiotocography changes incidence and severity of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy… compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Admission cardiotocography vs intermittent auscultation

Neonatal seizures · Low risk pregnant women. All of the women were in labour.

Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in incidence of seizures in the neonatal period compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Padma 28 vs placebo

Adverse effects · people with symptomatic intermittent claudication

It is very uncertain whether padma 28 changes adverse effects compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

Suprapubic catheterisation showed no clear difference in number of participants with symptomatic UTI compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Indwelling urethral catheterisation vs intermittent urethral catheterisation

Asymptomatic bacteruria · Patients with short‐term bladder drainage

It is very uncertain whether indwelling urethral catheterisation changes asymptomatic bacteruria compared with intermittent urethral catheterisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review